Share this content on Facebook!
25 Jan 2016
When a process is working, conventional wisdom suggests leaving it alone. Whether or not this isn't broken, why correct it?

At our firm, though, we may rather devote extra energy to making a good process great. Instead of resting on our laurels, following the last few years focusing on our private equity finance research, not because we have been dissatisfied, but because the world thinks even our strengths could become stronger.

As an investor, then, what in case you look for when considering a personal equity investment? Many of the same things carry out when considering it over a client's behalf.

Private equity finance 101: Due Diligence Basics

Private equity finance is, at its simplest, investments that are not on a public exchange. However, I take advantage of the term here much more specifically. When I talk about private equity, I do not mean lending money to a entrepreneurial friend or providing other designs of venture capital. The investments I discuss are widely-used to conduct leveraged buyouts, where considerable amounts of debt are issued to invest in takeovers of companies. Importantly, We are discussing private equity funds, not direct investments in privately operated companies.

Before researching any private equity finance investment, it is crucial to know the general risks associated with this asset class. Investments in private equity can be illiquid, with investors generally prohibited to make withdrawals from funds throughout the funds' life spans of A decade or more. These investments have higher expenses as well as a higher risk of incurring large losses, or possibly a complete loss of principal, compared to typical mutual funds. Additionally, these investments will often be not available to investors unless their net incomes or net worths exceed certain thresholds. For these particular risks, private equity investments are not appropriate for many individual investors.

For our clients who hold the liquidity and risk tolerance to consider private equity investments, basic principles of due diligence have never changed, and thus the building blocks of our process remains the same. Before we propose any private equity manager, we dig deeply in the manager's investment technique to make sure we understand and therefore are comfortable with it. We must be sure we are fully aware of the particular risks involved, therefore we can identify any red flags that require a closer look.

Whenever we see a deal-breaker at any stage from the process, we close the lid on immediately. There are many quality managers, and we all do not feel compelled to take a position with any particular one. Questions we have must be answered. If a manager gives unacceptable or unclear replies, we go forward. As an investor, pick should always be to understand a manager's strategy and be sure that nothing about it worries you. You've plenty of other choices.

Our firm prefers managers who generate returns start by making significant operational improvements to portfolio companies, as an alternative to those who rely on leverage. We also research and evaluate a manager's history. While the decision about if you should invest should not be depending on past investment returns, neither when they are ignored. On the contrary, that is among the biggest and many important pieces of data of a manager that you can easily access.

Additionally we consider each fund's "vintage" when evaluating its returns. A fund that began in 2007 or 2008 is likely to have lower returns than the usual fund that began earlier or later. Even though the fact that a manager launched previous funds prior to or during a down period for the economy is not an instant deal-breaker, take time to understand what the manager learned from that time and how he or she can apply that knowledge down the road.

We look into how managers' previous fund portfolios were structured and find out how they expect the existing fund to be structured, specifically how diversified the portfolio will probably be. How many portfolio companies does the manager expect to own, as an example, and what is the maximum amount of the portfolio that could be invested in any one company? A more concentrated portfolio will carry the chance of higher returns, and also more risk. Investors' risk tolerances vary, but all should view the amount of risk a great investment involves before taking it on. If, for instance, a manager has done an inadequate job of constructing portfolios in the past by making large bets on businesses that didn't pan out, steer clear about the likelihood of future success.

Like all investments, one of the most critical indicators in evaluating private equity finance is fees, which can seriously impact your long-term returns. Most private equity finance managers still charge the conventional 2 percent management fee and Twenty percent carried interest (a share in the profits, often over a specified hurdle rate, that goes to the manager ahead of the remaining profits are divided with investors), but some may charge approximately. Any manager who charges more ought to give a clear justification to the higher fee. We now have never invested which has a private equity manager who charges greater than 20 percent carried interest. If managers charge less than 20 percent, that can obviously make their own more attractive than typical funds, though, as with the other considerations on this page, fees should not be the only real basis of investment decisions.

Take your time. Our process is thorough and deliberate. Ensure that you understand and are more comfortable with the fund's internal controls. While most fund managers will not likely get a sniff of great interest from investors without strong internal controls, some funds can slip through the cracks. Watch out for funds that don't provide annual audited financial statements or that cannot clearly fix where they store their balances. Feel free to visit the manager's office and ask for a tour.

The more or less open secret within the private equity industry is that everything is negotiable. See if you can negotiate lower fees or, if you would like it, a reduced minimum commitment. At private equity's peak in the year 2006 and 2007, managers had every one of the leverage, so negotiating together was difficult. The tables have turned, and it can be much easier to set up an investment on your own terms, particularly for investment managers and institutional investors, but to some lesser extent for folks as well.

Next Steps: In excess of And Beyond

Times change. Even though the fundamentals remain largely exactly the same, private equity is an industry as with any other, which means that new ways of thinking and different approaches arise. We be determined in staying current with trends and issues on the market.

The tools and data open to advisers have improved, although more information can ultimately make our jobs easier, will still be up to us - as it's to investors performing their particular due diligence - to really make the best use of the data. As an example, when our Investment Committee evaluates an individual equity manager, we now look for managers who follow similar strategies therefore we can compare them. Even when a manager passes all of our tests, we find that it's still worth looking at other managers to find out how they compare.

A particular item of data that is easier to find is how a manager's investment return was owing to the manager's expertise and operational improvements to portfolio companies and how much to the macroeconomic environment or leverage. Some managers might not be able or ready to provide this information, however for those who are, it can be worthwhile in providing a definite measure of how much value a manager added.

We also have created formal procedures in order that our client private equity portfolios are diversified by strategy and vintage. We don't have a maximum that people recommend for any one strategy or vintage, because each client has different goals and risk tolerance. But by having this step and keeping track of diversification in a disciplined way, we seek to generate higher returns and minimize risk over the long term.

We've also devoted added time to considering each client's target equity finance allocation. In the past, natural meats have recommended a maximum 10 or 20 percent, but could some clients may have the risk tolerance and liquidity for higher allocations. For other clients, even those that have large portfolios, organic beef not recommend any private equity at all. A one-size-fits-all approach just isn't appropriate for investment decisions generally, but specially when determining the level of private equity finance investment. Individual decisions are expected.

While you need not necessarily follow every step in our process, this will ensure that you have thoroughly considered neglect the before you proceed. Ideally, you'll still will have identified an individual equity manager with a strong track record and it has provided enough transparency so you are confident questions have been answered and then for any additional concerns is going to be addressed. You should understand the investment's strategy and charges and feel sure its returns have already been generated by expertise and never luck. If you are ready to make a sizable investment, you will ideally negotiate favorable terms rather than paying rack rates.

These are our goals once we propose a private equity investment to one of our clients. Equity finance investing can carry significant risk, nevertheless it can still be an appropriate addition for a long-term investment strategy. While our approach does not guarantee a fund will offer market-beating returns, it determines that this fund is free of warning flags. We take pride in our due diligence, and we will continue to look for possibilities to improve our process.


There isn't any comment in this page yet!

Do you want to be the first commenter?

New Comment

Full Name:
E-Mail Address:
Your website (if exists):
Your Comment:
Security code: